He was comfortable first, then she was. Anyway, it is necessary to note 2 points:
The heroine really did not show any obvious resistance, this fact was impossible to miss. At the same time, she told the guy, or rather her husband, that it was not about helping, the farm allegedly had nothing to do with it. Given its behavior and character,
more
He was comfortable first, then she was. Anyway, it is necessary to note 2 points: The heroine really did not show any obvious resistance, this fact was impossible to miss. At the same time, she told the guy, or rather her husband, that it was not about helping, the farm allegedly had nothing to do with it. Given its behavior and character, the pro-incident view can be questioned. Fear, I'd dismiss it. Benefits are the most obvious option. And when things began to fall apart, Constance took the chance. The hero was the initiator, besides the family man, and she - with the groom. That is, at least the question of family values and feelings, and his wife in a good way had to arrange a showdown and clarify the relationship. But the story is silent about it, and this is not the only careless detail. For such a film, a melancholy-phlegmatic mood is essential, although not so critical. In French, it is imposing and dry (this is characteristic of many films, but it is often found in French cinema). It is felt in the atmosphere, in the characters and in the dialogue. It is impossible to blame everything on these components, but this feature explains a lot, the ambiguity that the author imposed on us. P.S. And in principle, it is very resourceful under the pretext of help (and accordingly frequent meetings) to use the occasion to satisfy your desires.
|